Flutter Vs React Native: What To Choose In 2023?

15 June 2023 / By Arham Technosoft
Flutter vs. React Native

Indeed, choosing between Flutter and React Native in 2023 is a significant decision for mobile app development. Both frameworks have their advantages and considerations, and it’s important to evaluate them based on your project requirements and objectives.

Flutter, developed by Google, has gained considerable popularity since its release in 2017. It utilizes Dart as its programming language, which offers simplicity and ease of learning. Flutter’s unique architecture and customizable UI rendering engine enable excellent performance and smooth animations. It provides a native-like experience and allows for code sharing across multiple platforms, including iOS, Android, web, and desktop. Flutter’s hot reload feature facilitates rapid development, debugging, and iteration. Its rich set of customizable UI components, called widgets, ensures consistent and visually appealing interfaces.

On the other hand, React Native, introduced by Facebook in 2015, has established a strong presence in the mobile app development landscape. It employs JavaScript as its programming language, which is widely known and supported. React Native’s bridge architecture enables seamless communication between JavaScript and native code, facilitating access to device-specific features and APIs. It supports both iOS and Android platforms and offers experimental support for web, Windows, and macOS platforms. React Native’s extensive ecosystem provides a wide range of third-party libraries, tools, and resources, making it suitable for diverse development needs.

In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve deeper into various aspects of Flutter and React Native to help you make an informed choice.

Popularity and Community Support:


Since its release by Google in 2017, Flutter has gained significant traction in the developer community. Its popularity has been growing steadily, and it has a strong and supportive community. The community actively contributes to the development of libraries, packages, and tools, providing valuable resources for developers.

React Native:

React Native, introduced by Facebook in 2015, has been widely adopted and has a massive community of developers. It has been around for a longer time, which has allowed the community to grow and create an extensive ecosystem of packages, tutorials, and resources. The popularity of React Native ensures a wealth of community support and a vast range of third-party libraries to choose from.

Both frameworks have thriving communities, but React Native has a slight edge due to its longer existence and larger community size.

Programming Language:


Flutter uses Dart, a modern, object-oriented programming language developed by Google. Dart is known for its simplicity and ease of learning, making it accessible to developers with different backgrounds. While Dart may not be as widely used as JavaScript, it offers strong typing, which can help catch errors at compile time and improve code reliability.

React Native:

React Native utilizes JavaScript, a popular and widely-used programming language. JavaScript is known for its flexibility and large developer community. Many developers are already familiar with JavaScript, which can lower the learning curve when starting with React Native.

Choosing between Dart and JavaScript ultimately depends on your team’s expertise and preferences. If you have a team experienced in JavaScript, React Native may be a more natural fit. However, Dart’s simplicity and powerful features make it an attractive option as well.



Flutter’s performance is exceptional due to its unique architecture. It employs a customizable UI rendering engine, which eliminates the need for OEM widgets and allows for fast UI rendering and animations. Flutter’s performance is particularly notable for graphics-intensive applications and UI interactions.

React Native:

React Native uses a bridge to communicate between JavaScript and native code, which can introduce a slight performance overhead. While React Native has made significant improvements in performance, it may still encounter performance bottlenecks when handling complex UI animations or heavy computations.

If performance is a critical factor for your project, Flutter’s architecture and the ability to fine-tune UI rendering can provide an edge over React Native.

UI Components:


Flutter offers a rich set of customizable UI components, called widgets, which are built using its own rendering engine. These widgets allow you to create visually appealing and consistent UI across platforms. Flutter’s UI components are not dependent on the underlying platform’s native controls, ensuring a consistent look and feel.

React Native:

React Native relies on native components for UI rendering, utilizing the platform’s built-in UI controls. This means that the UI components in React Native adhere to the platform’s specific design guidelines, providing a more native-like experience. However, there may be slight differences in the appearance of UI elements between platforms.

If having a consistent UI across platforms is crucial, Flutter’s custom widgets offer an advantage. On the other hand, if you prioritize a native look and feel, React Native’s reliance on native components might be preferable.

Development Speed and Iteration:


Flutter’s Hot Reload feature allows developers to see instant changes in the app’s UI during the development process. This feature significantly speeds up development and debugging, making it ideal for rapid prototyping and iteration. Flutter’s Hot Reload eliminates the need to restart the app or navigate back to a specific screen, saving valuable development time.

React Native:

React Native also provides a fast development cycle with its own version of Hot Reload called Fast Refresh. While not as seamless as Flutter’s Hot Reload, React Native’s Fast Refresh allows developers to see changes in the code reflected in the running app without restarting the entire application.

Both frameworks offer efficient development cycles, but Flutter’s Hot Reload is often praised for its speed and smooth experience.

Code Reusability:


With Flutter, you can write a single codebase that can run on both iOS and Android platforms. The framework’s “write once, run anywhere” approach enables significant code sharing, reducing development time and effort. However, some platform-specific code may be necessary for specific device features or integrations.

React Native:

React Native also promotes code reusability by sharing a significant portion of the codebase between platforms. JavaScript logic can be reused, but platform-specific code is required for certain functionalities, such as accessing device-specific features or integrating with specific native libraries.

Both frameworks offer code reusability, but Flutter’s architecture allows for more extensive code sharing between platforms.

Ecosystem and Third-Party Libraries:


Flutter has a growing ecosystem of packages and libraries available through its package manager, Pub. While not as vast as React Native’s ecosystem, Flutter’s library collection is continually expanding. Many essential functionalities and UI components are readily available, although the selection might be narrower compared to React Native.

React Native:

React Native has a mature and extensive ecosystem with a wide range of third-party libraries and packages available through npm (Node Package Manager). This ecosystem provides access to a vast array of pre-built components, tools, and integrations, making it easier to add specific functionalities to your app.

React Native’s well-established ecosystem gives it an advantage in terms of the variety and availability of third-party libraries and tools.

Platform Support:


Flutter supports both iOS and Android platforms, allowing you to target both major mobile platforms with a single codebase. Flutter also offers excellent support for desktop and web platforms, although these capabilities are still in the experimental phase and may not be as mature as the mobile support.

React Native:

React Native also supports both iOS and Android platforms, making it a suitable choice for cross-platform development. Additionally, React Native has experimental support for Windows, macOS, and web platforms, expanding its reach beyond mobile devices.

Both frameworks offer multi-platform support, but Flutter’s stability and maturity in supporting desktop and web platforms are worth considering.

Native Integrations:


Flutter provides a robust set of APIs and plugins that allow seamless integration with native code and third-party services. It enables developers to access platform-specific features and functionalities, making it suitable for applications that require deep native integrations.

React Native:

React Native’s bridge architecture allows for the integration of native modules, enabling access to device-specific features and APIs. The framework provides a bridge that enables communication between JavaScript and native code, facilitating the use of existing native libraries and modules.

Both frameworks offer native integrations, but Flutter’s well-documented APIs and plugins make it easier to achieve deeper native integrations.


In conclusion, both Flutter and React Native are powerful frameworks for cross-platform mobile app development. The choice between the two depends on your project’s specific requirements, team expertise, and preferences.

Choose Flutter if:
  • Performance is a critical factor, especially for graphics-intensive applications.
  • You prioritize a consistent UI across platforms.
  • You value a fast development cycle and efficient iteration.
  • You want extensive code sharing between platforms.
  • You are interested in experimenting with desktop and web platforms.
Choose React Native if:
  • You prefer JavaScript or have a team experienced in JavaScript.
  • You prioritize a native look and feel for your app.
  • You value a vast ecosystem of third-party libraries and tools.
  • You require extensive native integrations with device-specific features.
  • You want to target multiple platforms, including experimental support for desktop and web.

Ultimately, both Flutter and React Native have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice depends on your project’s specific needs. Assessing factors like performance, UI requirements, development speed, code reusability, ecosystem, platform support, and native integrations will help you make an informed decision for your mobile app development in 2023.

Arham Technosoft is proud to offer top-notch mobile app development services. Our team of skilled developers and designers has extensive experience in building high-quality, user-friendly, and innovative mobile applications for various platforms, including iOS and Android.

We follow a comprehensive approach to mobile app development, starting from understanding our clients’ requirements and conducting in-depth research and analysis. Our team works closely with clients throughout the development process to ensure that their vision is transformed into a fully functional and visually appealing mobile app.

Contact Arham Technosoft today to discuss your mobile app development requirements and let us bring your ideas to life.

About The Author

Arham Technosoft

Leave a Comment
*Please complete all fields correctly